<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 244 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201421</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision to uphold interest on differential duty paid through supplementary invoices, citing that the Commissioner cannot challenge a High Court judgment. The Tribunal distinguished the case from a Supreme Court precedent, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant based on a recent Karnataka High Court decision and providing relief by overturning the decision to levy interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 23:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 244 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201421</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision to uphold interest on differential duty paid through supplementary invoices, citing that the Commissioner cannot challenge a High Court judgment. The Tribunal distinguished the case from a Supreme Court precedent, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant based on a recent Karnataka High Court decision and providing relief by overturning the decision to levy interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>