https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201420 The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matters for a fresh decision without requiring any pre-deposits. The dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the stay order was overturned, and the Tribunal ruled that the longer period of limitation cannot be invoked based on suppression or malafide intent. The issue of valuation of physicians samples was also resolved in favor of the appellant, with the Tribunal emphasizing the need to consider contradictory decisions during the relevant period. The stay petition and appeal were disposed of accordingly. en-us Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Jan 2011 23:07:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201420 The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matters for a fresh decision without requiring any pre-deposits. The dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the stay order was overturned, and the Tribunal ruled that the longer period of limitation cannot be invoked based on suppression or malafide intent. The issue of valuation of physicians samples was also resolved in favor of the appellant, with the Tribunal emphasizing the need to consider contradictory decisions during the relevant period. The stay petition and appeal were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201420