<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 191 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201406</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand challenge. Regarding the penalties under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, the Tribunal set them aside, citing reasonable cause under Section 80. However, the penalty under Section 77 was upheld. The appeal was partly allowed, with penalties under Sections 76 and 78 being set aside, and the penalty under Section 77 being upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 23:19:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 191 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201406</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand challenge. Regarding the penalties under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, the Tribunal set them aside, citing reasonable cause under Section 80. However, the penalty under Section 77 was upheld. The appeal was partly allowed, with penalties under Sections 76 and 78 being set aside, and the penalty under Section 77 being upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>