<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 687 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201394</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Adjudicating Authority, determining that the goods manufactured by the appellant qualified as brass billets based on their composition and weight. The Adjudicating Authority&#039;s interpretation of the IS specification and consideration of the goods&#039; characteristics were deemed appropriate. Despite the Revenue&#039;s argument that brass ingots and billets were distinct, the Tribunal found no merit in their appeal and dismissed it, affirming the lower authority&#039;s decision to grant SSI exemption to the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 14:25:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 687 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201394</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Adjudicating Authority, determining that the goods manufactured by the appellant qualified as brass billets based on their composition and weight. The Adjudicating Authority&#039;s interpretation of the IS specification and consideration of the goods&#039; characteristics were deemed appropriate. Despite the Revenue&#039;s argument that brass ingots and billets were distinct, the Tribunal found no merit in their appeal and dismissed it, affirming the lower authority&#039;s decision to grant SSI exemption to the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>