<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 335 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201382</link>
    <description>On a prima facie review, the Tribunal found that the proprietor&#039;s registration with the department and income tax returns filed in his name supported the department&#039;s view that he was the service provider, and it was not persuaded by the claim that family members were actually operating the business. On that limited interim footing, and in view of the confirmed demand for cable service tax, cess, interest and penalties, the Tribunal ordered an additional pre-deposit as a condition for continued stay of recovery during the appeal. The direction was interlocutory and expressly confined to securing revenue pending final disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:36:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 335 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201382</link>
      <description>On a prima facie review, the Tribunal found that the proprietor&#039;s registration with the department and income tax returns filed in his name supported the department&#039;s view that he was the service provider, and it was not persuaded by the claim that family members were actually operating the business. On that limited interim footing, and in view of the confirmed demand for cable service tax, cess, interest and penalties, the Tribunal ordered an additional pre-deposit as a condition for continued stay of recovery during the appeal. The direction was interlocutory and expressly confined to securing revenue pending final disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>