<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 297 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201380</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act and remanded the matter for recalculating the correct amount of service tax payable by considering the amount received by the appellants as inclusive of service tax. The decision emphasized the importance of timely compliance, awareness of tax regulations, and the correct treatment of amounts in service tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 297 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201380</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act and remanded the matter for recalculating the correct amount of service tax payable by considering the amount received by the appellants as inclusive of service tax. The decision emphasized the importance of timely compliance, awareness of tax regulations, and the correct treatment of amounts in service tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>