<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 295 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201378</link>
    <description>A transfer of property to an assessee&#039;s second wife was examined in the context of an asserted family arrangement and alleged gift-tax liability under the Gift Tax Act. The Tribunal treated the arrangement as bona fide, and the court noted that whether a family arrangement is bona fide is a question of fact. Because that finding rested on factual assessment, it did not by itself create a question of law, much less a substantial question of law for appellate interference. The transfer was therefore treated as part of a bona fide family arrangement, no substantial question of law arose, and the appeal was held not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 295 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201378</link>
      <description>A transfer of property to an assessee&#039;s second wife was examined in the context of an asserted family arrangement and alleged gift-tax liability under the Gift Tax Act. The Tribunal treated the arrangement as bona fide, and the court noted that whether a family arrangement is bona fide is a question of fact. Because that finding rested on factual assessment, it did not by itself create a question of law, much less a substantial question of law for appellate interference. The transfer was therefore treated as part of a bona fide family arrangement, no substantial question of law arose, and the appeal was held not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>