<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 586 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201375</link>
    <description>Small-scale industry exemption under Notification No. 8/2003 is unavailable where manufactured goods bear a brand name belonging to another concern. Manufacture and clearance of such branded goods without registration and payment of duty support the resulting classification and duty liability. Suppression of material facts and non-registration permit invocation of the extended limitation period. Where the conditions for mandatory penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act are established, pre-show-cause-notice payment does not justify reducing the penalty below the duty evaded. The stated result sustains the duty demand, rejects the exemption and limitation challenges, and applies penalty equal to the evaded duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:32:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 586 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201375</link>
      <description>Small-scale industry exemption under Notification No. 8/2003 is unavailable where manufactured goods bear a brand name belonging to another concern. Manufacture and clearance of such branded goods without registration and payment of duty support the resulting classification and duty liability. Suppression of material facts and non-registration permit invocation of the extended limitation period. Where the conditions for mandatory penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act are established, pre-show-cause-notice payment does not justify reducing the penalty below the duty evaded. The stated result sustains the duty demand, rejects the exemption and limitation challenges, and applies penalty equal to the evaded duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>