<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 584 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201357</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta upheld the interim suspension order of a customs house clearing agent under Regulation 20(2) of the Custom House Agent Licensing Regulations, 2004, allowing for suspension pending revocation proceedings. The court mandated that if revocation proceedings were not initiated within one month, the suspension would be automatically revoked. If proceedings commenced but were not concluded within three months, the suspension would again be automatically revoked after four months. The court aimed to ensure timely resolution and fairness. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly, emphasizing compliance with the court&#039;s directives for the parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 584 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201357</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta upheld the interim suspension order of a customs house clearing agent under Regulation 20(2) of the Custom House Agent Licensing Regulations, 2004, allowing for suspension pending revocation proceedings. The court mandated that if revocation proceedings were not initiated within one month, the suspension would be automatically revoked. If proceedings commenced but were not concluded within three months, the suspension would again be automatically revoked after four months. The court aimed to ensure timely resolution and fairness. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly, emphasizing compliance with the court&#039;s directives for the parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>