<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 475 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201336</link>
    <description>Amendment to Rule 96ZI of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 could not retrospectively withdraw Modvat credit that had already accrued when capital goods entered the factory and the credit was entered before the amendment. Because the proviso inserted with effect from 2-6-1998 did not clearly state that it applied retrospectively, it was treated as prospective only. A later restriction cannot defeat an accrued credit entitlement under the existing scheme unless the legislative text clearly provides otherwise. The assessee was therefore entitled to use the already accrued credit, and the amendment could not be invoked to deny it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 18:07:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 475 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201336</link>
      <description>Amendment to Rule 96ZI of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 could not retrospectively withdraw Modvat credit that had already accrued when capital goods entered the factory and the credit was entered before the amendment. Because the proviso inserted with effect from 2-6-1998 did not clearly state that it applied retrospectively, it was treated as prospective only. A later restriction cannot defeat an accrued credit entitlement under the existing scheme unless the legislative text clearly provides otherwise. The assessee was therefore entitled to use the already accrued credit, and the amendment could not be invoked to deny it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>