<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 406 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201333</link>
    <description>A judicial or quasi-judicial order determining the rights of parties must disclose the reasons and basis for the conclusion reached. An order that merely follows earlier similar matters, without independent examination of the record or discussion of the merits, is a non-speaking order and cannot withstand appellate scrutiny. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s cryptic order was held unsustainable and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after giving both sides a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 17:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 406 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201333</link>
      <description>A judicial or quasi-judicial order determining the rights of parties must disclose the reasons and basis for the conclusion reached. An order that merely follows earlier similar matters, without independent examination of the record or discussion of the merits, is a non-speaking order and cannot withstand appellate scrutiny. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s cryptic order was held unsustainable and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after giving both sides a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>