<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 62 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201318</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the respondent. The court found that discrepancies in sheet thickness did not impact the eligibility for Cenvat credit as duty payment was weight-based, not thickness-based. It was concluded that denying credit based solely on thickness differences was unjustified, and the Revenue failed to prove any suppression or misdeclaration by the assessee. As the assessee received the duty-paid inputs for which credit was claimed, the appeal was disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 62 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201318</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the respondent. The court found that discrepancies in sheet thickness did not impact the eligibility for Cenvat credit as duty payment was weight-based, not thickness-based. It was concluded that denying credit based solely on thickness differences was unjustified, and the Revenue failed to prove any suppression or misdeclaration by the assessee. As the assessee received the duty-paid inputs for which credit was claimed, the appeal was disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>