<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (5) TMI 250 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157906</link>
    <description>Where a special taxing statute does not expressly exclude the procedural machinery of the Code of Criminal Procedure, investigative powers under the Code may be used for suspected tax evasion if not inconsistent with that statute. The Gauhati HC noted that the search and seizure of the assessee&#039;s books were carried out on the basis of a warrant issued in the course of a cognizable offence investigation, and, in the absence of the records, the factual basis in the respondents&#039; affidavit was not displaced. On that footing, the seizure was not treated as illegal merely because it was not shown to have been made under the precise machinery of the Assam Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1956.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 12:54:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (5) TMI 250 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157906</link>
      <description>Where a special taxing statute does not expressly exclude the procedural machinery of the Code of Criminal Procedure, investigative powers under the Code may be used for suspected tax evasion if not inconsistent with that statute. The Gauhati HC noted that the search and seizure of the assessee&#039;s books were carried out on the basis of a warrant issued in the course of a cognizable offence investigation, and, in the absence of the records, the factual basis in the respondents&#039; affidavit was not displaced. On that footing, the seizure was not treated as illegal merely because it was not shown to have been made under the precise machinery of the Assam Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1956.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>