<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 384 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157902</link>
    <description>Sanitary ware classification under entry 49 of Schedule C, Part II to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 was determined by ordinary, trade and commercial understanding rather than a restricted meaning. Stopcock, bibcock, concealed stopcock, sinkcock, anglecock, round shower, wall mixer, inlet connection and pillarcock were held to fall within sanitary ware or fittings thereof because they were goods ordinarily sold by sanitary ware dealers, predominantly used as bathroom ware, and not covered by any exclusion. Their possible use for other purposes did not alter their classification. The items were therefore not taxable under the residuary entry, and the Tribunal&#039;s classification was upheld in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 18:34:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 384 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157902</link>
      <description>Sanitary ware classification under entry 49 of Schedule C, Part II to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 was determined by ordinary, trade and commercial understanding rather than a restricted meaning. Stopcock, bibcock, concealed stopcock, sinkcock, anglecock, round shower, wall mixer, inlet connection and pillarcock were held to fall within sanitary ware or fittings thereof because they were goods ordinarily sold by sanitary ware dealers, predominantly used as bathroom ware, and not covered by any exclusion. Their possible use for other purposes did not alter their classification. The items were therefore not taxable under the residuary entry, and the Tribunal&#039;s classification was upheld in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>