https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157895 A fixed-term temporary appointment ending on expiry of the contract does not, by itself, amount to retrenchment or justify reinstatement with full back wages. Section 25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was held inapplicable where the termination was strictly in accordance with the employment contract, and unfair labour practice could not be inferred merely from a later engagement of another worker without material showing successive temporary appointments to deny permanent status. Relief under Section 11-A is discretionary and depends on a legally sustainable finding of illegal termination, which was absent. en-us Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jun 2014 16:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157895 A fixed-term temporary appointment ending on expiry of the contract does not, by itself, amount to retrenchment or justify reinstatement with full back wages. Section 25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was held inapplicable where the termination was strictly in accordance with the employment contract, and unfair labour practice could not be inferred merely from a later engagement of another worker without material showing successive temporary appointments to deny permanent status. Relief under Section 11-A is discretionary and depends on a legally sustainable finding of illegal termination, which was absent. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157895