<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 648 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157894</link>
    <description>In land acquisition valuation, enhancement of compensation must be based on reliable comparable sales and other acceptable evidence showing that the award is inadequate. The claimants bear the burden of proving entitlement to higher compensation, and that burden is not discharged by reliance on non-comparable or unreliable sale instances, especially where the acquired lands are agricultural and lack developed amenities. The assessment of market value involves judgment, and appellate interference is not justified unless there is misapplication of principle. On the facts noted, the High Court was right in restoring the Land Acquisition Officer&#039;s award and refusing enhancement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2014 19:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 648 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157894</link>
      <description>In land acquisition valuation, enhancement of compensation must be based on reliable comparable sales and other acceptable evidence showing that the award is inadequate. The claimants bear the burden of proving entitlement to higher compensation, and that burden is not discharged by reliance on non-comparable or unreliable sale instances, especially where the acquired lands are agricultural and lack developed amenities. The assessment of market value involves judgment, and appellate interference is not justified unless there is misapplication of principle. On the facts noted, the High Court was right in restoring the Land Acquisition Officer&#039;s award and refusing enhancement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>