https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157890 Appointments made outside the statutory municipal recruitment procedure were treated as void and contrary to fair public employment requirements, so reinstatement could not follow automatically. Although non-compliance with industrial retrenchment provisions was relevant, the Court held that the Labour Court and High Court failed to consider the illegality of the initial appointments, the temporary nature of the work, and the use of public funds. The High Court also erred in refusing to examine the merits merely because an interim order had already been acted upon. The direction for reinstatement was set aside and compensation was ordered instead, while the workmen were allowed to retain wages and emoluments already received under the interim arrangement. en-us Tue, 02 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157890 Appointments made outside the statutory municipal recruitment procedure were treated as void and contrary to fair public employment requirements, so reinstatement could not follow automatically. Although non-compliance with industrial retrenchment provisions was relevant, the Court held that the Labour Court and High Court failed to consider the illegality of the initial appointments, the temporary nature of the work, and the use of public funds. The High Court also erred in refusing to examine the merits merely because an interim order had already been acted upon. The direction for reinstatement was set aside and compensation was ordered instead, while the workmen were allowed to retain wages and emoluments already received under the interim arrangement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157890