<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 313 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157873</link>
    <description>Consumer price support subsidy received under the fertiliser price support scheme was not treated as part of taxable turnover under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act. The price control framework fixed the maximum sale price, while the retention price mechanism provided manufacturers a government-funded return. Because the subsidy was not paid by the purchaser or on the purchaser&#039;s behalf as consideration for any specific sale, and the sale was not conditional on receipt of the subsidy, it was not an amount received in respect of sales. The subsidy therefore remained outside turnover and was not liable to sales tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:30:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 313 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157873</link>
      <description>Consumer price support subsidy received under the fertiliser price support scheme was not treated as part of taxable turnover under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act. The price control framework fixed the maximum sale price, while the retention price mechanism provided manufacturers a government-funded return. Because the subsidy was not paid by the purchaser or on the purchaser&#039;s behalf as consideration for any specific sale, and the sale was not conditional on receipt of the subsidy, it was not an amount received in respect of sales. The subsidy therefore remained outside turnover and was not liable to sales tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>