https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157868 The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench's ruling, dismissing the appeal by the appellant firm regarding the dismissal of eight workmen. The Court emphasized the Labour Court's discretion on reinstatement, stating that the High Court should not interfere unless there are valid reasons such as disturbance of industrial peace. The Court criticized the High Court's reasoning for quashing the reinstatement order, noting the lack of evidence supporting potential industrial hostilities or the firm's practice of re-engaging seasonal workers. The Court reiterated that the High Court's role is supervisory and should not act as an appellate authority over industrial tribunal decisions unless there is a clear violation of principles. en-us Wed, 03 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157868 The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench's ruling, dismissing the appeal by the appellant firm regarding the dismissal of eight workmen. The Court emphasized the Labour Court's discretion on reinstatement, stating that the High Court should not interfere unless there are valid reasons such as disturbance of industrial peace. The Court criticized the High Court's reasoning for quashing the reinstatement order, noting the lack of evidence supporting potential industrial hostilities or the firm's practice of re-engaging seasonal workers. The Court reiterated that the High Court's role is supervisory and should not act as an appellate authority over industrial tribunal decisions unless there is a clear violation of principles. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157868