https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157859 A conviction under Section 4 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act was found unsustainable because the prosecution evidence contained serious infirmities. Full reappraisal of the record showed that the alleged inflammatory speech rested only on two intelligence witnesses, despite a large crowd and substantial police presence, and no independent witness was examined though such evidence was available. The rough notes said to underlie the report were not produced, and the investigation was described as perfunctory, with no meaningful enquiry into the accused's antecedents or related allegations. The conviction and sentence were set aside and acquittal followed. en-us Tue, 20 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157859 A conviction under Section 4 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act was found unsustainable because the prosecution evidence contained serious infirmities. Full reappraisal of the record showed that the alleged inflammatory speech rested only on two intelligence witnesses, despite a large crowd and substantial police presence, and no independent witness was examined though such evidence was available. The rough notes said to underlie the report were not produced, and the investigation was described as perfunctory, with no meaningful enquiry into the accused's antecedents or related allegations. The conviction and sentence were set aside and acquittal followed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157859