https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157850 The Supreme Court found the termination of respondent 1's service by the appellant-company to be illegal and unjustified, deeming it punitive in nature due to non-disclosure of adverse reports. While acknowledging the general rule of reinstatement for illegal terminations, the Court considered the sensitive nature of respondent 1's position and security risks, directing the company to pay compensation of Rs. 3840 instead. The decision emphasized the need to assess individual circumstances and employer concerns in cases of wrongful termination. en-us Thu, 18 Dec 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Aug 2014 09:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157850 The Supreme Court found the termination of respondent 1's service by the appellant-company to be illegal and unjustified, deeming it punitive in nature due to non-disclosure of adverse reports. While acknowledging the general rule of reinstatement for illegal terminations, the Court considered the sensitive nature of respondent 1's position and security risks, directing the company to pay compensation of Rs. 3840 instead. The decision emphasized the need to assess individual circumstances and employer concerns in cases of wrongful termination. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Dec 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157850