<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 364 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157844</link>
    <description>Surgical cotton was treated as falling within the ordinary commercial meaning of &quot;all kinds of cotton&quot; in the relevant notification, because the omission of the words &quot;in its manufactured or unmanufactured state&quot; did not narrow the entry and the commodity retained its essential identity as cotton. The words &quot;that is to say&quot; were not confined to raw cotton alone, and the entry was wide enough to include cotton waste as well. Surgical cotton was also not a pharmaceutical preparation, since it was dressing material rather than a preparation of medicinal drugs. A commodity covered by the specific cotton entry could not be assessed under the residuary rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:35:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 364 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157844</link>
      <description>Surgical cotton was treated as falling within the ordinary commercial meaning of &quot;all kinds of cotton&quot; in the relevant notification, because the omission of the words &quot;in its manufactured or unmanufactured state&quot; did not narrow the entry and the commodity retained its essential identity as cotton. The words &quot;that is to say&quot; were not confined to raw cotton alone, and the entry was wide enough to include cotton waste as well. Surgical cotton was also not a pharmaceutical preparation, since it was dressing material rather than a preparation of medicinal drugs. A commodity covered by the specific cotton entry could not be assessed under the residuary rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>