<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 281 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157842</link>
    <description>A clarification issued under section 59A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 could not validly determine the rate of tax on X-ray films because that power did not authorise the Government to decide tax classification or rate. The Tribunal&#039;s view that the clarification could not support the revised and original assessments was consistent with binding precedent, and no error of law was shown to justify interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:33:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 281 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157842</link>
      <description>A clarification issued under section 59A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 could not validly determine the rate of tax on X-ray films because that power did not authorise the Government to decide tax classification or rate. The Tribunal&#039;s view that the clarification could not support the revised and original assessments was consistent with binding precedent, and no error of law was shown to justify interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>