<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 272 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157837</link>
    <description>A State exemption notification that limited relief to goods processed or manufactured &quot;in the State&quot; was held discriminatory because identical goods imported from other States, though otherwise satisfying the exemption conditions, were denied the same tax benefit. The Court applied the constitutional guarantee of free trade and held that a State exemption power cannot be used to impose a restriction that favours local goods over imported goods. The words &quot;in the State&quot; in clause 5 were declared unconstitutional, and the assessment orders and demand notices based on that clause were quashed; the matter was remanded for fresh decision under the exemption notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:21:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 272 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157837</link>
      <description>A State exemption notification that limited relief to goods processed or manufactured &quot;in the State&quot; was held discriminatory because identical goods imported from other States, though otherwise satisfying the exemption conditions, were denied the same tax benefit. The Court applied the constitutional guarantee of free trade and held that a State exemption power cannot be used to impose a restriction that favours local goods over imported goods. The words &quot;in the State&quot; in clause 5 were declared unconstitutional, and the assessment orders and demand notices based on that clause were quashed; the matter was remanded for fresh decision under the exemption notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>