<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (9) TMI 317 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157833</link>
    <description>Classification of aluminium foil under a concessional tax notification depended on its common parlance and trade meaning, because the word &quot;sheet&quot; was not treated as a technical term. In taxing entries, the decisive test is how the commodity is understood in the relevant trade and by persons dealing in it, rather than its nomenclature or mode of manufacture. As no evidence had been led on the popular meaning of &quot;sheet&quot; in the non-ferrous metal trade, remand was appropriate so the parties could prove whether aluminium foil was commonly regarded as a sheet or as a distinct commodity. The Tribunal&#039;s remand order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:08:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (9) TMI 317 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157833</link>
      <description>Classification of aluminium foil under a concessional tax notification depended on its common parlance and trade meaning, because the word &quot;sheet&quot; was not treated as a technical term. In taxing entries, the decisive test is how the commodity is understood in the relevant trade and by persons dealing in it, rather than its nomenclature or mode of manufacture. As no evidence had been led on the popular meaning of &quot;sheet&quot; in the non-ferrous metal trade, remand was appropriate so the parties could prove whether aluminium foil was commonly regarded as a sheet or as a distinct commodity. The Tribunal&#039;s remand order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>