<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 369 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157832</link>
    <description>For sales tax purposes, only the actual money consideration agreed and charged for a sale forms part of sale price and turnover under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954. A reduced price charged for a replacement tyre meant the difference between that price and the catalogue price was not money consideration received or receivable for the sale. The absence of a warranty clause did not change this position, and a voluntary concession or adjustment did not convert the uncharged amount into taxable turnover. In the absence of suppression, the invoice price could not be ignored or replaced by a notional market price, so the assessments including the unrecovered amount were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:07:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 369 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157832</link>
      <description>For sales tax purposes, only the actual money consideration agreed and charged for a sale forms part of sale price and turnover under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954. A reduced price charged for a replacement tyre meant the difference between that price and the catalogue price was not money consideration received or receivable for the sale. The absence of a warranty clause did not change this position, and a voluntary concession or adjustment did not convert the uncharged amount into taxable turnover. In the absence of suppression, the invoice price could not be ignored or replaced by a notional market price, so the assessments including the unrecovered amount were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>