https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157830 Termination of a workman's service, even under a contractual or temporary engagement, was held to constitute retrenchment unless it fell within a statutory exception. Continuous engagement for more than 240 days, coupled with discontinuance without notice or retrenchment compensation and no material to attract Section 2(oo)(bb), brought the case within Section 25F, so reinstatement was justified. The High Court, acting under Article 226, was held not entitled to reappreciate evidence or interfere with the Labour Court's factual findings absent jurisdictional error or patent illegality. Its interference was therefore unwarranted, and the reinstatement award was restored with consequential back wages as specified. en-us Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157830 Termination of a workman's service, even under a contractual or temporary engagement, was held to constitute retrenchment unless it fell within a statutory exception. Continuous engagement for more than 240 days, coupled with discontinuance without notice or retrenchment compensation and no material to attract Section 2(oo)(bb), brought the case within Section 25F, so reinstatement was justified. The High Court, acting under Article 226, was held not entitled to reappreciate evidence or interfere with the Labour Court's factual findings absent jurisdictional error or patent illegality. Its interference was therefore unwarranted, and the reinstatement award was restored with consequential back wages as specified. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157830