https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157829 In writ or supervisory jurisdiction, a High Court cannot upset a Labour Court's award by introducing a new plea of illegal initial appointment that was neither pleaded nor proved before the Labour Court, especially where the Labour Court had already found retrenchment in breach of the last come first go rule under Section 25G of the Industrial Disputes Act. The High Court's role under Articles 226 and 227 is confined to jurisdictional error, patent illegality, perversity, or an error apparent on the record, and it cannot function as an appellate forum or reopen factual findings. On that basis, the interference with reinstatement was held unwarranted and the Labour Court's award was restored. en-us Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Jun 2014 13:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157829 In writ or supervisory jurisdiction, a High Court cannot upset a Labour Court's award by introducing a new plea of illegal initial appointment that was neither pleaded nor proved before the Labour Court, especially where the Labour Court had already found retrenchment in breach of the last come first go rule under Section 25G of the Industrial Disputes Act. The High Court's role under Articles 226 and 227 is confined to jurisdictional error, patent illegality, perversity, or an error apparent on the record, and it cannot function as an appellate forum or reopen factual findings. On that basis, the interference with reinstatement was held unwarranted and the Labour Court's award was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157829