<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 565 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157821</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commission&#039;s order awarding interest for delayed possession of houses. It directed the Bangalore Development Authority to complete the execution and registration of sale deeds for the houses within three months, with the respondent bearing stamp duty and registration costs. The Court held that the respondent was not entitled to interest on the price paid as the houses were delivered at the agreed price, and there was no deficiency in service on the part of the BDA. Each party was to bear its respective costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 565 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157821</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commission&#039;s order awarding interest for delayed possession of houses. It directed the Bangalore Development Authority to complete the execution and registration of sale deeds for the houses within three months, with the respondent bearing stamp duty and registration costs. The Court held that the respondent was not entitled to interest on the price paid as the houses were delivered at the agreed price, and there was no deficiency in service on the part of the BDA. Each party was to bear its respective costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>