<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (8) TMI 283 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157816</link>
    <description>Fresh assessment after remand was held within the one-year limit under section 21(4), because the remand order was received on 30 June 1989 and the reassessment was completed on 8 June 1990. Tax on purchases of empty tins was sustained, as section 12-A placed the burden on the dealer to prove exemption or non-liability, and the assessee failed to give verifiable particulars showing intra-State purchases. Interest on the entire reassessed demand was disallowed because the tax had earlier been deposited, refunded after the earlier result, and re-imposed only after remand; monthly instalments were also granted, with interest confined to any defaulted instalment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:37:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (8) TMI 283 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157816</link>
      <description>Fresh assessment after remand was held within the one-year limit under section 21(4), because the remand order was received on 30 June 1989 and the reassessment was completed on 8 June 1990. Tax on purchases of empty tins was sustained, as section 12-A placed the burden on the dealer to prove exemption or non-liability, and the assessee failed to give verifiable particulars showing intra-State purchases. Interest on the entire reassessed demand was disallowed because the tax had earlier been deposited, refunded after the earlier result, and re-imposed only after remand; monthly instalments were also granted, with interest confined to any defaulted instalment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>