<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (2) TMI 286 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157814</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the dismissal order of the appellant, a bank manager, due to a breach of natural justice in the inquiry process. The Court directed the respondent-bank to conduct a fresh inquiry, allowing the appellant to cross-examine witnesses. The appellant was to remain suspended, receive subsistence allowance, and cooperate in the expedited inquiry process. No costs were imposed on either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:32:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (2) TMI 286 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157814</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the dismissal order of the appellant, a bank manager, due to a breach of natural justice in the inquiry process. The Court directed the respondent-bank to conduct a fresh inquiry, allowing the appellant to cross-examine witnesses. The appellant was to remain suspended, receive subsistence allowance, and cooperate in the expedited inquiry process. No costs were imposed on either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>