https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157807 Credible ocular testimony was held to prevail over speculative inconsistency with medical evidence, and defects in investigation, including non-examination of some witnesses and failure to send the firearm for forensic testing, did not by themselves dislodge otherwise reliable prosecution evidence. The plea of alibi failed because it was not affirmatively supported by material showing the accused was elsewhere at the relevant time. Alleged delay in delivery of the High Court judgment did not, without demonstrated prejudice, justify interference. The concurrent findings of guilt were therefore left undisturbed. en-us Fri, 16 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157807 Credible ocular testimony was held to prevail over speculative inconsistency with medical evidence, and defects in investigation, including non-examination of some witnesses and failure to send the firearm for forensic testing, did not by themselves dislodge otherwise reliable prosecution evidence. The plea of alibi failed because it was not affirmatively supported by material showing the accused was elsewhere at the relevant time. Alleged delay in delivery of the High Court judgment did not, without demonstrated prejudice, justify interference. The concurrent findings of guilt were therefore left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157807