https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157801 In second appeal under Section 100 CPC, the High Court's jurisdiction is confined to substantial questions of law; concurrent findings of fact cannot be reversed unless such a question is formulated and decided, so the impugned judgments were unsustainable for non-compliance. Inordinate delay between hearing and pronouncement of judgment can also justify interference because it raises concern that the issues were not properly appreciated, and may warrant setting aside and remitting the matter without a merits determination. The High Court judgments were therefore set aside and the matters remitted for fresh disposal in accordance with law. en-us Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157801 In second appeal under Section 100 CPC, the High Court's jurisdiction is confined to substantial questions of law; concurrent findings of fact cannot be reversed unless such a question is formulated and decided, so the impugned judgments were unsustainable for non-compliance. Inordinate delay between hearing and pronouncement of judgment can also justify interference because it raises concern that the issues were not properly appreciated, and may warrant setting aside and remitting the matter without a merits determination. The High Court judgments were therefore set aside and the matters remitted for fresh disposal in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157801