https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157798 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the decree for specific performance of an agreement, citing a significant delay in the delivery of judgment. The Court set aside the judgment and remitted the case back to the High Court for a fresh decision within six months. Respondent No. 1, in possession of the property, was allowed to continue under certain conditions, ensuring the appellants' interest in the property was protected. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs, emphasizing the importance of timely resolution by the High Court. en-us Thu, 13 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:19:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157798 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the decree for specific performance of an agreement, citing a significant delay in the delivery of judgment. The Court set aside the judgment and remitted the case back to the High Court for a fresh decision within six months. Respondent No. 1, in possession of the property, was allowed to continue under certain conditions, ensuring the appellants' interest in the property was protected. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs, emphasizing the importance of timely resolution by the High Court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157798