<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 317 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157792</link>
    <description>For authorisation under section 24 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, the expression &quot;turnover of sales&quot; had to be read in context where the statutory definition was qualified by the words &quot;unless the context otherwise requires&quot;. A construction limited only to sales effected within Maharashtra would make the provision unworkable, because goods are despatched outside the State after sale at the destination. The expression therefore covered the sale price received or receivable in respect of sales made at the place outside Maharashtra where the goods were despatched. On that interpretation, the turnover requirement was satisfied and the contrary view of the authorities was erroneous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:41:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 317 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157792</link>
      <description>For authorisation under section 24 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, the expression &quot;turnover of sales&quot; had to be read in context where the statutory definition was qualified by the words &quot;unless the context otherwise requires&quot;. A construction limited only to sales effected within Maharashtra would make the provision unworkable, because goods are despatched outside the State after sale at the destination. The expression therefore covered the sale price received or receivable in respect of sales made at the place outside Maharashtra where the goods were despatched. On that interpretation, the turnover requirement was satisfied and the contrary view of the authorities was erroneous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>