https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157790 Exclusion of some nearby lands did not, by itself, establish discriminatory or arbitrary treatment, because the respondents' lands were found integral to the housing scheme and selective exclusion would frustrate the project. The errata notification was treated as relating back to the original Section 4(1) notification, so it did not invalidate the Section 6 declaration; participation in the Section 5A enquiry cured any objection based on lack of a fresh enquiry. Irregularities in notice under Sections 9 and 10 were curable, possession taken by panchnama was sufficient to vest the land in the State under Section 16, and delay in making the award did not invalidate the acquisition in view of the statutory additional amount and interest. The acquisition proceedings were upheld. en-us Thu, 16 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jul 2014 17:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157790 Exclusion of some nearby lands did not, by itself, establish discriminatory or arbitrary treatment, because the respondents' lands were found integral to the housing scheme and selective exclusion would frustrate the project. The errata notification was treated as relating back to the original Section 4(1) notification, so it did not invalidate the Section 6 declaration; participation in the Section 5A enquiry cured any objection based on lack of a fresh enquiry. Irregularities in notice under Sections 9 and 10 were curable, possession taken by panchnama was sufficient to vest the land in the State under Section 16, and delay in making the award did not invalidate the acquisition in view of the statutory additional amount and interest. The acquisition proceedings were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157790