https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157776 A writ petition under Article 226 is ordinarily not maintainable against a show-cause notice issued by a competent statutory authority when the challenge depends on disputed questions of fact and the notice is not ex facie without jurisdiction. Where the controversy concerns entitlement to premises and the basis of occupation, the affected party should first raise objections before the authority and allow the statutory process to proceed. Judicial interference at the notice stage is unwarranted unless the notice is a patent nullity. The High Court erred in quashing the notice and eviction proceedings without permitting adjudication of the disputed facts by the statutory authority. en-us Wed, 22 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Dec 2025 14:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157776 A writ petition under Article 226 is ordinarily not maintainable against a show-cause notice issued by a competent statutory authority when the challenge depends on disputed questions of fact and the notice is not ex facie without jurisdiction. Where the controversy concerns entitlement to premises and the basis of occupation, the affected party should first raise objections before the authority and allow the statutory process to proceed. Judicial interference at the notice stage is unwarranted unless the notice is a patent nullity. The High Court erred in quashing the notice and eviction proceedings without permitting adjudication of the disputed facts by the statutory authority. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157776