https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157773 Municipal employees could not claim transfer of municipal quarters merely on the basis of corporation resolutions, because the statutory scheme vested executive power in the Municipal Commissioner and governed disposal of immovable municipal property through Section 200. The Commissioner could transfer such property only with the required sanction, and the sale consideration had to reflect fair market competition. Since the Corporation had no independent authority to dispose of immovable property contrary to these conditions, its resolutions alone could not create any legal right in favour of the employees. The claim to ownership or transfer was therefore untenable, and the petitions failed. en-us Thu, 21 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157773 Municipal employees could not claim transfer of municipal quarters merely on the basis of corporation resolutions, because the statutory scheme vested executive power in the Municipal Commissioner and governed disposal of immovable municipal property through Section 200. The Commissioner could transfer such property only with the required sanction, and the sale consideration had to reflect fair market competition. Since the Corporation had no independent authority to dispose of immovable property contrary to these conditions, its resolutions alone could not create any legal right in favour of the employees. The claim to ownership or transfer was therefore untenable, and the petitions failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157773