<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (7) TMI 331 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157749</link>
    <description>Penalty for delayed monthly tax payments under section 12-B(3) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act was held to be discretionary and quasi-criminal, requiring judicial assessment of the assessee&#039;s conduct and surrounding circumstances. Recurring but marginal delays, substantial tax payment, and an un-rejected explanation supported penalty, but the appellate authorities erred by computing the levy on a basis akin to section 13(2), which was not the correct measure for this provision. Penalty was therefore justified, yet confined to a nominal amount proportionate to the default, with Rs. 500 for each assessment year found appropriate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 14:12:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (7) TMI 331 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157749</link>
      <description>Penalty for delayed monthly tax payments under section 12-B(3) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act was held to be discretionary and quasi-criminal, requiring judicial assessment of the assessee&#039;s conduct and surrounding circumstances. Recurring but marginal delays, substantial tax payment, and an un-rejected explanation supported penalty, but the appellate authorities erred by computing the levy on a basis akin to section 13(2), which was not the correct measure for this provision. Penalty was therefore justified, yet confined to a nominal amount proportionate to the default, with Rs. 500 for each assessment year found appropriate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>