<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 341 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157734</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 16(1)(e) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 could not be sustained where the return required under section 7(1) was not filed before a valid prescribed authority. A return lodged otherwise was not a valid return for penalty purposes because, in the absence of a properly constituted authority, the filing requirement was not satisfied. The validating legislation cured defects in assessment and administrative action, but it did not retrospectively create a penal offence or deem earlier defective returns valid. Penal liability could arise only for conduct that was an offence under the law as it stood when done, so the penalty finding remained against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:43:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 341 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157734</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 16(1)(e) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 could not be sustained where the return required under section 7(1) was not filed before a valid prescribed authority. A return lodged otherwise was not a valid return for penalty purposes because, in the absence of a properly constituted authority, the filing requirement was not satisfied. The validating legislation cured defects in assessment and administrative action, but it did not retrospectively create a penal offence or deem earlier defective returns valid. Penal liability could arise only for conduct that was an offence under the law as it stood when done, so the penalty finding remained against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>