<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (6) TMI 248 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157733</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court held that sewing thread retains its identity as &quot;cotton yarn&quot; for taxation purposes. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, rejecting the State&#039;s argument that sewing thread should be taxed differently. The High Court relied on its own precedents and those from other High Courts to support its conclusion. Consequently, the tax revision case was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:40:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (6) TMI 248 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157733</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court held that sewing thread retains its identity as &quot;cotton yarn&quot; for taxation purposes. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, rejecting the State&#039;s argument that sewing thread should be taxed differently. The High Court relied on its own precedents and those from other High Courts to support its conclusion. Consequently, the tax revision case was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>