<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (1) TMI 280 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157717</link>
    <description>An exemption notification for machinery used to set up specified industries was construed according to its object, limiting the benefit to machinery needed for that purpose. Fire-bricks used in ceramic manufacturing were treated as hardened bricks, not as a machine, organised mechanism, or part of a machine. On that construction, the purchase of fire-bricks did not fall within the exemption, the declaration form was wrongly used, and penalty exposure followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 18:28:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (1) TMI 280 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157717</link>
      <description>An exemption notification for machinery used to set up specified industries was construed according to its object, limiting the benefit to machinery needed for that purpose. Fire-bricks used in ceramic manufacturing were treated as hardened bricks, not as a machine, organised mechanism, or part of a machine. On that construction, the purchase of fire-bricks did not fall within the exemption, the declaration form was wrongly used, and penalty exposure followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>