<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 274 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157708</link>
    <description>Review under section 39(7) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act is confined to newly discovered, important facts that were outside the applicant&#039;s knowledge, or could not be produced, despite due diligence when the original order was made. The claim that x-ray films should be treated as photographic films under item 151 of the First Schedule was already available at the time of the original appeal and was therefore not a subsequent discovery. The statutory requirements of discovery and due diligence were not satisfied, and no error of law was shown in the refusal to review. The review applications were held not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 17:46:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 274 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157708</link>
      <description>Review under section 39(7) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act is confined to newly discovered, important facts that were outside the applicant&#039;s knowledge, or could not be produced, despite due diligence when the original order was made. The claim that x-ray films should be treated as photographic films under item 151 of the First Schedule was already available at the time of the original appeal and was therefore not a subsequent discovery. The statutory requirements of discovery and due diligence were not satisfied, and no error of law was shown in the refusal to review. The review applications were held not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>