<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 331 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157644</link>
    <description>A levy on Schedule C goods under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act was treated as purchase tax, not consignment tax, because the taxable event remained the purchase of the goods and not their later transfer to branches outside the State. The branch transfer or consignment only determined when the deferred tax became payable at the prescribed purchase stage, including the last-dealer stage specified by section 5(3). The Court held that the levy did not fall within the exclusive parliamentary field under Entry 92B and was within the State Legislature&#039;s competence. Goodyear was distinguished and Hotel Balaji treated as controlling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 18:38:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 331 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157644</link>
      <description>A levy on Schedule C goods under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act was treated as purchase tax, not consignment tax, because the taxable event remained the purchase of the goods and not their later transfer to branches outside the State. The branch transfer or consignment only determined when the deferred tax became payable at the prescribed purchase stage, including the last-dealer stage specified by section 5(3). The Court held that the levy did not fall within the exclusive parliamentary field under Entry 92B and was within the State Legislature&#039;s competence. Goodyear was distinguished and Hotel Balaji treated as controlling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>