<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (1) TMI 278 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157640</link>
    <description>The term &quot;paper&quot; in a taxing entry, when left undefined, must be understood in its common parlance sense. On that basis, white printed wrappers used for packing cotton textile goods remained paper because they continued to perform a packing function and did not lose their character merely because they were printed for a specific use. A later amendment adding &quot;printed wrappers of paper&quot; was treated as indicating a lower tax rate for that category, not as excluding such wrappers from the earlier specific entry. The residuary entry applied only where no specific entry covered the goods, so the wrappers fell within the paper entry and not the residuary charge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 18:18:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (1) TMI 278 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157640</link>
      <description>The term &quot;paper&quot; in a taxing entry, when left undefined, must be understood in its common parlance sense. On that basis, white printed wrappers used for packing cotton textile goods remained paper because they continued to perform a packing function and did not lose their character merely because they were printed for a specific use. A later amendment adding &quot;printed wrappers of paper&quot; was treated as indicating a lower tax rate for that category, not as excluding such wrappers from the earlier specific entry. The residuary entry applied only where no specific entry covered the goods, so the wrappers fell within the paper entry and not the residuary charge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>