<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 333 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157619</link>
    <description>The dominant object test determines whether food and drinks supplied by a hotel are taxable as sales or can be treated as a service component. Under Article 366(29-A)(f), table service does not by itself justify exclusion of turnover where the real commercial object remains supply of eatables and drinks and service is merely incidental. The document also states that avoidance of purchase tax on kerosene and diesel depends on proof that the goods had already suffered tax; the burden remains on the assessee under Section 6A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, and a statutory presumption is not displaced merely because the commodities are controlled goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 17:03:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 333 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157619</link>
      <description>The dominant object test determines whether food and drinks supplied by a hotel are taxable as sales or can be treated as a service component. Under Article 366(29-A)(f), table service does not by itself justify exclusion of turnover where the real commercial object remains supply of eatables and drinks and service is merely incidental. The document also states that avoidance of purchase tax on kerosene and diesel depends on proof that the goods had already suffered tax; the burden remains on the assessee under Section 6A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, and a statutory presumption is not displaced merely because the commodities are controlled goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>