<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (11) TMI 169 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157576</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the Auroville (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1980, dismissing the writ petitions. It concluded that the Act did not violate Articles 14, 25, 26, 29, and 30 of the Constitution. The court emphasized that the Act was necessary for the proper management of Auroville, a secular cultural township of national and international significance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (11) TMI 169 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157576</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the Auroville (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1980, dismissing the writ petitions. It concluded that the Act did not violate Articles 14, 25, 26, 29, and 30 of the Constitution. The court emphasized that the Act was necessary for the proper management of Auroville, a secular cultural township of national and international significance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>