<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (2) TMI 285 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157557</link>
    <description>Section 5-A of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was construed as a clear levy on total turnover, including liquor turnover, even where part of that turnover was taxed under other provisions. The Statement of Objects and Reasons could not narrow the charging language. The deduction used to compute liquor tax under section 5 and the Sixth Schedule was only a measure for that levy and did not operate as an exemption from turnover tax. The differential exemption treatment for goods exempt under section 9 did not establish discrimination under article 14, since exemption is a matter of legislative policy and no constitutional infirmity was shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:04:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (2) TMI 285 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157557</link>
      <description>Section 5-A of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was construed as a clear levy on total turnover, including liquor turnover, even where part of that turnover was taxed under other provisions. The Statement of Objects and Reasons could not narrow the charging language. The deduction used to compute liquor tax under section 5 and the Sixth Schedule was only a measure for that levy and did not operate as an exemption from turnover tax. The differential exemption treatment for goods exempt under section 9 did not establish discrimination under article 14, since exemption is a matter of legislative policy and no constitutional infirmity was shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>