<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (11) TMI 212 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157553</link>
    <description>Packing charges for cement sold under the Cement Control Order, 1967 were treated as part of the sale price and not a separable deduction from taxable turnover, because packing was a necessary incident of the sale rather than an optional item. The Karnataka High Court&#039;s earlier view in Visvesvaraya Iron &amp; Steel Ltd. and the later Supreme Court ruling in Ramco Cement Distribution Co. Pvt. Ltd. were noted as confirming that exclusion of such charges was impermissible. The text also explains that omission of binding precedent in assessment orders can amount to a mistake apparent from the record, making rectification permissible under section 25-A where the statutory period remains open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (11) TMI 212 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157553</link>
      <description>Packing charges for cement sold under the Cement Control Order, 1967 were treated as part of the sale price and not a separable deduction from taxable turnover, because packing was a necessary incident of the sale rather than an optional item. The Karnataka High Court&#039;s earlier view in Visvesvaraya Iron &amp; Steel Ltd. and the later Supreme Court ruling in Ramco Cement Distribution Co. Pvt. Ltd. were noted as confirming that exclusion of such charges was impermissible. The text also explains that omission of binding precedent in assessment orders can amount to a mistake apparent from the record, making rectification permissible under section 25-A where the statutory period remains open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>