<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (2) TMI 396 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157552</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the findings of the lower authorities in a tax revision case involving penalty assessment under section 10A of the Central Sales Tax Act for false representation in using declaration form C for steel flats purchase. The court affirmed that the assessee willfully misrepresented their entitlement to use form C for steel flats, leading to the penalty imposition. Despite the assessee&#039;s argument that the inclusion of steel flats in the registration certificate did not imply false representation, all authorities found that the assessee knowingly used form C for steel flats, supporting the false representation conclusion. The court dismissed the tax revision cases and rejected the petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 17:50:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (2) TMI 396 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157552</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the findings of the lower authorities in a tax revision case involving penalty assessment under section 10A of the Central Sales Tax Act for false representation in using declaration form C for steel flats purchase. The court affirmed that the assessee willfully misrepresented their entitlement to use form C for steel flats, leading to the penalty imposition. Despite the assessee&#039;s argument that the inclusion of steel flats in the registration certificate did not imply false representation, all authorities found that the assessee knowingly used form C for steel flats, supporting the false representation conclusion. The court dismissed the tax revision cases and rejected the petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>